An argument in favor of the sharia law in view of universal declaration of human rights

History[ edit ] Various Muslim countries had criticized the Universal Declaration of Human Rights for its failure to take into account the cultural and religious context of non- Western countries. It has been signed by 45 states so far. Contents[ edit ] The Declaration starts[ citation needed ] by saying "All men are equal in terms of basic human dignity " and it forbids "discrimination on the basis of racecolourlanguagebeliefsexreligionpolitical affiliationsocial status or other considerations".

An argument in favor of the sharia law in view of universal declaration of human rights

However, much has happened since it went up, including the Blogger outage. Scroll down for a report on that. More new posts will be added below this one.

Blog Archive

The essay below is the conclusion of the ninth part in a series by Takuan Seiyo. See the list at the bottom of this post for links to the previous installments. Their main endeavor has been to enforce their compulsory e.

An argument in favor of the sharia law in view of universal declaration of human rights

K and discretionary e. Nor the evils of the worldwide Islamic Inquisition which — not in the 16th century but now, in the 21st, condemns Muslim apostates to barbaric execution. Instead, aggressive White androphobes of all genders which I can no longer count are decimating the philogynous and egalitarian West.

Equality psychos are tearing down the most egalitarian society that ever existed except for initial communist experiments, before they turned bloody.

Stay In Touch With Pro-Life Humanists

American Jews, at the apex of the greatest fortune and philosemitic tolerance their long diaspora has ever bestowed on their kind, are busy supporting all the ideologies and policies that demolish their safe harbor and build up their Muslim, Black and Third World enemies.

Leftoid masochists and the Christian meek call for returning Hawaii to the Hawaiians and capitulating before a massive Mexican reconquista of one-third of America. The rightful Etruscan landowners are not bearing angry placards in front of the Vatican. The Japanese are not planning to relinquish Hokkaido to its original owners, the Ainu.

The tall, white and fair-haired Chachapoyas of the Andean forest have, alas, no remnants left to sue the Incas for genocide in a Peruvian court of law. However, even that great moral abyss of Western civilization — the Holocausts — stands out more in its industrialized and organizational features than it does either in the quality of its hatefulness or its relative or even absolute volumes.

In relative numbers, in just one year,the Hutus and Tutsis in Rwanda, killed off a total of one million, in a population of 7 million.

An argument in favor of the sharia law in view of universal declaration of human rights

Is it more humane to go by a stroke of a blunt machete than by a whiff of Zyklon B? The Khmer Rouge murdered at least 2 million Cambodians between and Is it more humane to die by wallops from a Cambodian pickaxe handle than by a bullet from a German Mauser?

Inscription on the back in German: But the Holocausts do not prove that Whites are worse than other people, just that they are no better.

The history of the Third Reich also proves that with the right formula of economic blowup, misery and humiliation, sparked by charismatic evil, no people are immune to such horror, at no time.The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam Although the CDHRI uses a universalist language akin to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, CDHRI "undermines equality of persons and freedom of expression and religion by imposing restrictions on nearly every human right based on Islamic Sharia law.".

The legal system of Saudi Arabia is based on Sharia, Islamic law derived from the Qur'an and the Sunnah (the traditions) of the Islamic prophet sources of Sharia also include Islamic scholarly consensus developed after Muhammad's death.

Its interpretation by judges in Saudi Arabia is influenced by the medieval texts of the literalist Hanbali school of Islamic jurisprudence. Human Rights vs. Sharia: Violence Against Women the United Nations and have ratified the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, granting justice and equality, duties and rights to all.

The god of Muslims is revealed as a tyrant who demands Muslims and all others submit to him. Whereas in the New Testament, Jesus revealed to Christians a God who is a loving Father, who wants us to come to Him via free will.

Trump v. Hawaii :: U.S. ___ () :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

You are correct. I am using a reworded form of the SLED test. I was trained by Scott Klusendorf 13 years ago and I generally recommend his material. Scott is a theist but he nevertheless can make a strong secular case against abortion that has served as fuel to my own. Does Sharia Law contradict human rights?

80% Say Yes 20% Say No Mm mnmn, Mm mnmn, Mnbjhgjbj Yes, Sharia Law does contradict human rights. One of the central concepts of Sharia Law, as practiced by Muslim extremists, is that women are to be treated as second class citizens.

View Desktop Version.

Gates of Vienna